Research Foundation | Dimensional Literacy Platform

🎮 Play-Based Learning Research

The Science Playground and interactive modules are built on decades of cognitive science research showing that active exploration beats passive consumption for deep understanding.

Key Research References

Source	Finding	Our Application
Hirsh-Pasek et al. (2009)	Playful learning activates deeper encoding than direct instruction	Simulations before explanations; "aha" moments over lectures
Chi & Wylie (2014) - ICAP Framework	Interactive > Constructive > Active > Passive for learning outcomes	Every concept has an interactive component, not just reading
Bransford et al. (2000) - "How People Learn"	Prior knowledge activation essential for new learning	Curiosity hooks ("What if...?") before formal concepts
Fisher et al. (2013) - "Taking Shape"	Spatial play improves math/science outcomes	Physics simulations are fundamentally spatial reasoning tools
Montessori Method	Child-directed exploration with prepared environment	No forced paths; "Browse all" always visible; learner chooses

⏱️ Exposure Timing Research

Learning isn't about cramming everything at once. Our module release strategy and session design follow evidence on optimal spacing.

Principle	Research Basis	Implementation
Spacing Effect	Cepeda et al. (2006) - Optimal gaps between learning sessions	Don't push all simulations at once; introduce gradually
Interleaving	Rohrer & Taylor (2007) - Mixing topics beats blocking	Multiple pillars visible together, not isolated silos
Incubation	Sio & Ormerod (2009) - Breaks improve insight problem-solving	Sessions designed for 10-20 min, not hour-long marathons
Sleep Consolidation	Walker (2017) - "Why We Sleep"	No pressure to "finish"; progress saves naturally

                Core Principle: Each module should be genuinely useful before integration, not just "technically complete." Quality exposure over quantity.
            

🧠 Age-Appropriate Cognitive Load

Working memory capacity changes with development. Our interface adapts accordingly.

Age	Working Memory	UI Implications	Mode
4-7	~2-3 chunks	Icons only, no text, 3 options max	🎈 Play
8-12	~4-5 chunks	Simple words, 6 buttons, no numbers	🧪 Explore
12-16	~5-7 chunks	Sliders, real terms, some formulas	🔬 Discover
16+	~7+ chunks	Full controls, equations, data export	🎓 Learn

Source: Cowan (2001) - "The Magical Number 4"; Gathercole & Alloway (2008) - "Working Memory and Learning"

🚫 What Research Says NOT To Do

Anti-Pattern: Gamification rewards for learning
Why it fails: Deci & Ryan - undermines intrinsic motivation
Our avoidance: No XP visible to kids in Explore mode; tracking is silent

Anti-Pattern: Immediate feedback on "wrong" answers
Why it fails: Kills exploration; creates fear of failure
Our avoidance: No wrong way to play; moments celebrate discovery, not correctness

Anti-Pattern: Linear progression requirements
Why it fails: Removes agency; breeds resentment
Our avoidance: Skip to any experiment; no unlocking gates

Anti-Pattern: Information before experience
Why it fails: Kills curiosity; "school-ifies" play
Our avoidance: Experience first, explanation after ("What just happened?")

🔗 Module Integration Principles

Cross-Module Dependencies

Pillars connect to playground simulations. Each pillar page links to relevant interactive experiences.

Pillar	Playground Experiments	Connection
1. Scale & Proportion	Gravity Drop, Size Comparison	Experience magnitude viscerally
2. Emergence & Complexity	Pendulum Waves, Boids Flocking	Simple rules → complex patterns
3. Systems & Interdependence	Projectile Lab, Buoyancy	Multiple variables interacting
4. Energy & Transformation	Collision Physics, Pendulum	Energy transfer visualization
5. Probability & Uncertainty	Random Walk, Diffusion	Stochastic processes in action
6. Information & Patterns	Signal Noise, Pattern Detection	Information vs noise distinction
7. Time & Change	Decay Simulation, Growth Models	Temporal dynamics
8. Consciousness & Observation	Observer Effect, Attention Lab	Self-reference and awareness

Good Pattern: Each pillar concept page ends with "Experience This" linking to 2-3 relevant playground experiments. Learning flows from concept → simulation → reflection.

📊 Metadata & Learning Analytics

Progress tracking is designed to inform, not judge. All data stays local unless explicitly shared.

What We Track (Silently)

Time spent per simulation
Parameter exploration patterns
Return visits to concepts
Cross-pillar navigation paths

What We Don't Track

"Correct" vs "incorrect" answers (no such thing in exploration)
Completion percentages (learning isn't linear)
Comparative rankings (no leaderboards)

                Philosophy: Analytics serve the learner, not the platform. If a metric doesn't help someone learn better, we don't collect it.
            

📚 Further Reading

For those wanting to dive deeper into the research:

Hirsh-Pasek, K. et al. (2009). A Mandate for Playful Learning in Preschool
Chi, M.T.H. & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework. Educational Psychologist
Bransford, J.D. et al. (2000). How People Learn. National Academies Press
Cepeda, N.J. et al. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks. Psychological Bulletin
Walker, M. (2017). Why We Sleep. Scribner

🔬 Research Foundation